In our society a reality has at last become
accepted: Age and sexual gender do not dictate athletic potential. With the main
stream acceptance of high quality sports supplementation came stronger fitter
bodies of all ages and entire thirty, forty and fifty-something generations
pouring into the once undisputed young man’s domain…the gym. The term “sports
chemistry” once meant anabolic/androgenic steroids (AAS) and seedy images of
team doctors closing their office doors to inject some illicit substance into an
already enhanced athlete. Oh how things have changed! I often marvel at the way
that mere perception alters the responses one will receive to any given
statement of fact,… so let’s open with a good one:
Everything good or bad in life and bodybuilding depend upon the
chemistry we introduce our bodies to.
Before anyone gets their panties in a bunch and dials up all of the three
letter organizations that investigate illegal activities, let me
explain that
statement of fact. All organic and inorganic matter is made up of chemicals and
chemical substrates. Any living organism (uh, like you and me) not only has the
ability to, but an absolute need for interaction with the environment around it
through Action/Reaction Factors. As an example, think of the saturated fat in
red meat and eggs (don’t get me started on synthetic trans fats). The liver
utilizes saturated fats to manufacture or synthesize a steroid called
5-Cholesten-3b-ol. (Most people know this chemical by the name of cholesterol)
Through Action/Reaction Factors controlled and induced by natural endogenous
(manufactured inside the body) enzymes the body (begins its illegal activities)
utilizes a series of chemical biosynthesis pathways that include the following:
(1) Cholesterol > (2) Pregnenolone > (3) Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) >
(4) 4-Androstenedione > (5) Testosterone
Officer, arrest that body! It just manufactured an illegal AAS and
administered it without a doctor’s prescription
If this body had not been provided with saturated fats (chemical substrates)
it simply would have utilized unsaturated fats as the initial testosterone
precursor. If the intake of all fats had been excluded, the eventual outcome
would be predominant loss of lean muscle mass, energy, and libido with dramatic
increase of female pattern fat deposits.
Everything good or bad in life and bodybuilding depend upon the
chemistry we introduce our bodies to.
The term “sports chemistry” now refers to everything from diet and
supplementation to hormone therapy with testosterone, growth hormone (GH),
IGF-1, HCG, and progesterone. Thanks to the major advances made by the sports
supplement industry the main differences between each of these is the issue of
prescription –vs.– OTC since each is merely a chemical/chemical substrate. This
fact has leveled the playing field for athletes of all ages, level and gender by
blurring the fine line between chemical muscle enhancement and nature.
Interestingly enough, training and the results that come from it are nothing
more than chemistry as well. What few people realize is that there are specific
training protocols that result in specific responses. This again is controlled
by a series of Action/Reaction Factors and, to a great degree, are readily
altered to induce a specific response of choice.
Testosterone, GH, IGF-1, insulin, and many other hormones and hormone-like
substances are manufactured endogenously by the body in response to different
training stimulus if the proper chemical substrates are provided. Since each of
these has multiple and significant different effects upon an individuals
physiology, and more specifically upon muscle and fat tissue, it is therefore
possible to significantly effect the outcome of a chosen training and
supplemental protocol. I realize that many have unnecessarily
accepted the level of mediocrity that is often justified by the catch-all words
“genetic potential” and touted by way to many magazine articles. This of course
means that I am about to make some bold and crazy statement to the contrary.
(Definition of crazy: Not accepted by the main stream publications as their
current point of view) Anyone can significantly effect their own
genetic potential in a favorable way and by specific choice. (Ya, I said and
have proven that many times) I am not saying that everyone can be an Arnold,
Dorian, or Ronnie, but I am factually stating that through specific-intent
protocols and phases an individual can significantly effect specific results far
greater than ever imagined by the average athlete regardless of age or sexual
gender. (Ya, I said that too) Okay, I hate the quoting research sites game
simply because any idiot can alter a quote or statistic of most research
results. But just to momentarily quiet those who erroneously depend upon them
for sole validity (instead of actually training and being living examples
themselves etc.) I would like to point out a few actual findings. (Geez, you
would think a few pictures would do the job, huh?)
Sometimes good information comes from unexpected places. In a study done to
evaluate what effects 8 weeks of heavy weight training has upon serum lipid and
lipo protein concentrations scientist made an interesting series of discoveries.
As the scientist analyzed the data from 32 college males and females after
concluding an 8 week heavy weight training protocol they realized that the test
subjects muscle fibers showed evidence of converting from type-I (slow
twist) to type-II (fast twist) muscle fibers. First realize that this
occurred in only 8 weeks. Second, the fact that the aerobic muscle fibers
changed into size/strength oriented (therefore high growth potential) muscle
fibers in itself validates the potential for specific training stimulus for
specific results issue. By the way, it is good that the researchers were able to
extract this finding from their research project. (Research projects are not
cheap to fund) In fact an 8 week period is not enough time to produce any type
of result concerning lipid profiles.
Each of us possesses type-I (slow twist) and type-II (fast twist) muscle
fibers in different ratios in different muscle groups. The so-called “average”
individual initially possesses about a 50/50 body ratio. Type-I fibers are
considered low growth potential aerobic oriented muscle fibers and type-II
fibers are considered high growth potential anaerobic/strength muscle fibers.
Obviously the greater an athlete’s muscle fiber ratio favors type-II fibers, the
greater the potential for muscular growth and strength increase. The ability to
alter the ratio through specific training protocols means also the ability to
effectively alter genetic make-up.
Influences of resistance training on serum lipid and lipo protein
concentrations in young men and women. Journal of Strength and Cond. Res.
14(1):37-44, 2000.
Hormonal responses to high and moderate intensity strength training
exercise. Eur.J. Appl Physiol. 82:121-128, 2000
A study done in Oslo Norway examined long term and short term (acute) hormone
responses of 9 experienced test subjects to two different training intensities.
The high intensity work-out required the test subjects to perform free bar back
squats (front and back) using 100% of their 3 rep max for sets. The moderate
intensity work-out required the athletes to do the same exercises utilizing 70%
of their 3 rep max for sets. Rest periods were 4-6 minutes.
The test subjects blood samples were taken before, after 30 minutes into, and
every 15 minutes for the first hour after each work-out. Next, blood samples
were taken at 3, 7, 11, 22, and 23 hours post work-out.The analysis of the blood
samples was for: (1) Hormones positively affecting anabolism (tissue synthesis):
LH (leutenizing hormone), FSH (follicle stimulating hormone), testosterone
(free), insulin, growth hormone (GH), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).
(2) Hormones that affect catabolism (tissue wasting): ATCH (adrenocortotropic
hormone) and cortisol. · Other substrates analyzed include creatine kinase and
lactate. (As indicators of actual training intensity)
The test results verified that high intensity training induced a
significantly higher level of testosterone and cortisol secretion(and
moderate intensity did not) as a short term hormonal response. Though both
testing protocols showed a decreasing testosterone level in the post-training
hours, the high intensity training results were consistently higher than those
of the moderate intensity. LH and FSH levels were not significantly altered as a
result of either training intensity. This is a huge finding that exceeds the
evidence of higher intensity training protocols being the better method for
triggering a significant increase in testosterone.
The majority of endogenous (naturally produced inside the body) testosterone
synthesis in males is handled and regulated by the
hypothalamus-pituitary-testes-axis (HPTA). It all begins when the hypothalamus
receives neuro-net impulses that signal the release of leutenizing-hormone-releasing-hormone
(LHRH) which in turn tells the pituitary gland to release leutenizing hormone (LH).
LH then makes contact with the testes Leydig’s cells that produce testosterone
and release it into the vascular system. However, there is a secondary
testosterone synthesis pathway that may be hyper-activated as a result of high
intensity training protocols.
The adrenal glands produce several different hormones. The hormone of
interest for this issue is called dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). DHEA is an
androgen that is
responsive to enzymic alterations called conversions. Two of
the enzymic conversion products of DHEA are 4-androstenedione and
4-androstenediol which in turn are converted into testosterone by the 17-BHSD
and 3-BHSD enzymes respectively. Of course under normal metabolic conditions
there are several other potential conversion products possible including
estrogens. But high intensity training appears to foster a pro- 17 & 3- BHSD
environment that results in a favorable conversion rate of these two DHEA
conversion products to testosterone.
So specific training does have specific hormonal responses. What does that
have to do with altering genetic potential?
Histochem Cell. Biol. 113(1): 25-29, 2001
It is well documented that consistent heavy resistance training actually
increases the concentration (number) of androgen/anabolic receptor-sites on
trained muscle tissue. All AAS, whether produced endogenously or provided
exogenously (form outside the body), exert their serious anabolic effect by
binding or merging with androgenic/anabolic receptor-sites on muscle cells. If
muscle cells and fibers possess a greater number of these receptor-sites they
also possess a greater genetic growth potential. Guess what. Yup, testosterone
is an AAS.
J. Streng Cond. Res. 14(1): 102-113, 2000
So you have been told that you can not alter the peak of your bicep or build
a wider chest and back? To a great degree…B.S. Muscle is not merely a bunch of
fibers that attach to bones contracting and relaxing to provide potential
movement. Muscle is composed of multiple fiber sizes and types. Each fiber is
made up of different size cells with different individual metabolisms, and
different contractile potential and amino acid profiles. This means that during
different exercises and different angles of execution there is a different
recruitment pattern of different regions of the muscle (confirmed by EMG).
Therefore it is possible to trigger the growth process on a more site-specific
basis. So is it obvious yet that you can utilize specific protocols to induce
growth in specific areas resulting in an alteration in shape?
J. of the Amer. Med. Asso. 286(10)
It is too often accepted that age is the final deciding factor for muscular
growth potential. Without a doubt this is the silliest reason of all for anyone
to endure mediocrity.
When we are discussing the issues of muscular accruement we are actually
discussing which side of the protein-turn-over-rate (PTOR) an individuals body
favors. The PTOR is the rate at which an individuals body builds new proteins
(anabolism) and destroys old ones (catabolism). This means that for actual
muscular accruement to occur an athlete’s body must build more new proteins than
it destroys each day.
At the University of Texas in Galveston researchers utilized amino acid
tracing techniques to study 48 healthy men. The protocol was intended to track
the rate at which test subjects bodies created muscle proteins and destroyed
muscle proteins. What the researchers found was that the PTOR (protein turn over
rate) for both younger and older men is nearly the same. This means that
an individuals potential for lean muscle mass gain is potentially
the same regardless of age.
It seems that the reason for lean muscle tissue loss and weakening is not
necessarily age related. A sedentary life style is a sure way to cause a
dramatic decline in endogenous anabolic hormones such as testosterone, GH and
IGF-1. Poor dietary habits not only increase insulin insensitivity but also
alter an individuals body biochemistry to a point that disallows the ability to
properly utilize protein from food.
Bottom line here is that training protocols, diet, hormone profiles, and life
style are the main deciding factors for alterations in “genetic potential”
regardless of age and sexual gender. Building The Perfect Beast is a matter of
choice and letting go of the eternal dogma that holds each of us in mediocrity.
Oh ya, and…
Everything good or bad in life and bodybuilding depend upon the chemistry
we introduce our bodies to.
This may appear an over simplification of a normally complicated topic, but
in truth it is the tip of the ice burg and only the introduction to what is
possible for anyone who chooses, and what has been embraced by those have
experienced the reality.